Boyd's World-> Breadcrumbs Back to Omaha-> Program and Class Strength | About the author, Boyd Nation |
Publication Date: August 27, 2002
What's a Class?
It's time for my annual review of multi-year ISR's, and I thought for this year I'd try to see if I could distinguish between recruiting class strength and program strength. The question, "How do you measure program strength?" is pretty easy, from my point of view. I've got five years' worth of data, and five years strikes me as a pretty good indicator of program strength. It's short enough that you're either talking about a single head coach or a program that knows it has a few problems, but it's long enough that essentially no players have been around all that time, and none of them have played all five years.
"How do you measure a class?", though is a little tougher. In other sports, it's easier -- it's four years, the occasional lost-to-the-draft basketball player aside. In baseball, though, the professional draft distorts that picture. Lots of players become eligible for the draft after their junior year and leave. Some stay all four years. Some who are unhappy about their draft status out of high school but don't really want to wait three years head to junior college but then transfer to a senior college for a year or two when things don't work out the way they planned -- most D1 programs have at least a couple of juco transfers around in any given year. Anyway, since I have to make a call, I'm going to go with three years, since I think that's the most common length of time to have together what can be thought of as a cohesive set of teammates.
The Best Classes: 2000-2002
Without further ado, then, here are the top 25 for the last three seasons:
Rank ISR W L SoS Team 1 126.9 148 51 2 Stanford 2 123.5 125 62 1 Southern California 3 123.2 162 48 36 South Carolina 4 122.7 160 52 31 Florida State 5 121.8 140 61 10 Louisiana State 6 121.5 118 61 3 Cal State Fullerton 7 121.3 138 57 19 Rice 8 120.6 136 62 14 Texas 9 120.5 118 56 12 Arizona State 10 120.5 146 57 39 Clemson 11 120.4 144 54 45 Nebraska 12 119.8 138 52 50 Georgia Tech 13 118.9 125 65 18 Houston 14 118.6 110 64 11 Baylor 15 118.5 120 62 23 Alabama 16 118.4 132 51 62 Wake Forest 17 118.1 102 68 4 Long Beach State 18 117.5 123 69 25 Florida 19 117.5 120 60 42 Miami, Florida 20 117.2 111 62 30 San Jose State 21 116.5 112 67 29 Auburn 22 116.5 117 62 47 North Carolina 23 116.2 111 66 34 Texas Tech 24 115.9 113 73 24 Fresno State 25 115.6 105 74 13 Georgia
No real shocks here at the top -- losing the coin-toss national championship game two out of three years is a pretty good indicator you're doing something right. It's obviously possible for a national championship-type year to cover up one season of mediocrity, as Texas and Miami show. A couple of surprises -- Alabama had a fairly bad year in 2001, and I wouldn't have expected them to bounce this high. And did anyone out there actually realize that Fresno State has been one of the 25 best teams in the country over the last three years?
The Best Programs: 1998-2002
Now, the longer term:
1 126.6 238 80 238 80 2 Stanford 2 123.4 204 103 205 104 1 Southern California 3 123.1 266 84 269 84 28 Florida State 4 122.6 213 92 214 92 6 Cal State Fullerton 5 121.6 238 88 240 89 27 Rice 6 121.3 219 100 226 104 11 Louisiana State 7 120.2 216 96 217 96 18 Alabama 8 120.1 216 85 216 85 38 Miami, Florida 9 119.8 196 98 198 99 14 Arizona State 10 119.6 240 89 240 89 53 South Carolina 11 119.6 190 97 195 100 13 Baylor 12 118.8 231 100 231 100 44 Clemson 13 118.3 195 119 197 120 7 Texas 14 118.2 204 91 205 91 47 Nebraska 15 118.2 179 116 179 116 5 Long Beach State 16 117.9 215 93 222 94 56 Georgia Tech 17 117.6 204 104 204 104 37 Auburn 18 117.5 200 111 200 113 24 Houston 19 117.3 199 112 201 112 25 Florida 20 117.2 221 90 221 90 70 Wake Forest 21 117.2 179 102 181 102 26 Texas Tech 22 116.5 230 82 231 82 89 Wichita State 23 116.1 190 112 197 112 35 Mississippi State 24 116.0 222 92 226 94 78 Tulane 25 115.8 195 103 202 105 55 North Carolina
It will be interesting to see if some of the teams on this list who have been consistently good if not always great -- Auburn, Mississippi State, Tulane -- who suffered in 2002 will rebound next year, or if it's the beginning of a slide.
If you're interested in reprinting this or any other Boyd's World material for your publication or Web site, please read the reprint policy and contact me
Boyd's World-> Breadcrumbs Back to Omaha-> Program and Class Strength | About the author, Boyd Nation |