Boyd's World-> Ratings-> Pseudo-RPI's-> Schedule Analysis About the author, Boyd Nation

NCAA Division I Baseball -- RPI-Based Schedule Analysis for Murray State

Last updated: Sat Apr 30 07:01:27 2016

Team Components

Opponents' Winning % OWP 0.462
Opponents' Opponents' Winning % OOWP 0.499
Strength of Schedule OWP / 2 + OOWP / 4 0.35575


Schedule Analysis

Legend:

Contribution is the Strength of Schedule portion for the given opponent -- it directly scales with the SoS number above. Impact is the difference in the team's SoS and the opponent's contribution, divided by the number of games played.

Opponents marked in red do damage to the team's RPI, even if the team beats them. Opponents marked in yellow do damage if the team loses to them.

Opponent Location W L WP OWP Contribution Impact
Bethune-Cookman Bethune-Cookman 20 22 0.476 0.496 0.362 0.00016
Bethune-Cookman Bethune-Cookman 20 22 0.476 0.496 0.362 0.00016
Bethune-Cookman Bethune-Cookman 20 22 0.476 0.496 0.362 0.00016
Northern Illinois Murray State 15 25 0.375 0.468 0.304 -0.00129
Northern Illinois Murray State 15 25 0.375 0.468 0.304 -0.00129
Northern Illinois Murray State 15 25 0.375 0.468 0.304 -0.00129
Northern Illinois Murray State 15 25 0.375 0.468 0.304 -0.00129
Creighton Murray State 27 9 0.750 0.533 0.508 0.00381
Creighton Murray State 27 9 0.750 0.533 0.508 0.00381
Creighton Murray State 27 9 0.750 0.533 0.508 0.00381
IPFW Murray State 16 21 0.432 0.415 0.320 -0.00089
Kentucky Kentucky 26 15 0.634 0.571 0.460 0.00261
Tennessee-Martin Tennessee-Martin 12 26 0.316 0.488 0.280 -0.00189
Tennessee-Martin Tennessee-Martin 12 26 0.316 0.488 0.280 -0.00189
Tennessee-Martin Tennessee-Martin 12 26 0.316 0.488 0.280 -0.00189
Kansas Kansas 14 23 0.378 0.524 0.320 -0.00089
Kansas Kansas 14 23 0.378 0.524 0.320 -0.00089
Southern Illinois-Edwardsville Murray State 8 28 0.222 0.542 0.246 -0.00274
Southern Illinois-Edwardsville Murray State 8 28 0.222 0.542 0.246 -0.00274
Southern Illinois-Edwardsville Murray State 8 28 0.222 0.542 0.246 -0.00274
Memphis Murray State 14 28 0.333 0.503 0.292 -0.00159
Austin Peay State Austin Peay State 25 14 0.641 0.529 0.453 0.00243
Austin Peay State Austin Peay State 25 14 0.641 0.529 0.453 0.00243
Austin Peay State Austin Peay State 25 14 0.641 0.529 0.453 0.00243
Southern Illinois Southern Illinois 23 17 0.575 0.505 0.414 0.00146
Eastern Illinois Murray State 5 33 0.132 0.531 0.199 -0.00392
Eastern Illinois Murray State 5 33 0.132 0.531 0.199 -0.00392
Eastern Illinois Murray State 5 33 0.132 0.531 0.199 -0.00392
Southern Illinois Murray State 23 17 0.575 0.505 0.414 0.00146
Jacksonville State Jacksonville State 26 14 0.650 0.520 0.455 0.00248
Jacksonville State Jacksonville State 26 14 0.650 0.520 0.455 0.00248
Jacksonville State Jacksonville State 26 14 0.650 0.520 0.455 0.00248
Evansville Murray State 22 15 0.595 0.507 0.424 0.00171
St. Louis St. Louis 16 24 0.400 0.433 0.308 -0.00119
Mississippi Mississippi 32 11 0.744 0.595 0.521 0.00413
Tennessee Tech Murray State 21 18 0.538 0.411 0.372 0.00041
Tennessee Tech Murray State 21 18 0.538 0.411 0.372 0.00041
Tennessee Tech Murray State 21 18 0.538 0.411 0.372 0.00041
Alabama A&M Murray State 11 34 0.244 0.364 0.213 -0.00357
Southeast Missouri State Southeast Missouri State 29 11 0.725 0.485 0.484 0.00321
Southeast Missouri State Southeast Missouri State 29 11 0.725 0.485 0.484 0.00321

Legend:

Opponents marked in red will do damage to the team's RPI, even if the team beats them. Opponents marked in yellow will do damage if the team loses to them. Opponents marked in green will improve RPI, even if the team loses to them.

Potential Opponents, < 150 Miles

Opponent Distance W L WP OWP Contribution
Arkansas State 141.68 19 21 0.475 0.541 0.373
Austin Peay State 53.68 25 14 0.641 0.529 0.453
Belmont 91.56 24 17 0.585 0.401 0.393
Evansville 102.92 22 15 0.595 0.507 0.424
Lipscomb 91.82 20 21 0.488 0.446 0.355
Memphis 138.39 14 28 0.333 0.503 0.292
Middle Tennessee State 121.11 17 25 0.405 0.562 0.343
Southeast Missouri State 82.47 29 11 0.725 0.485 0.484
Southern Illinois 89.76 23 17 0.575 0.505 0.414
Tennessee-Martin 36.35 12 26 0.316 0.488 0.280
Vanderbilt 90.28 31 10 0.756 0.537 0.512
Western Kentucky 105.68 23 18 0.561 0.537 0.415

Potential Opponents, > 150 Miles and < 300 Miles

Opponent Distance W L WP OWP Contribution
Alabama 240.24 24 19 0.558 0.566 0.420
Alabama A&M 160.35 11 34 0.244 0.364 0.213
Alabama-Birmingham 231.44 17 22 0.436 0.584 0.364
Arkansas-Little Rock 260.45 20 18 0.526 0.526 0.395
Arkansas-Pine Bluff 265.49 17 21 0.447 0.398 0.323
Ball State 293.66 25 17 0.595 0.439 0.407
Bradley 289.19 15 15 0.500 0.464 0.366
Butler 251.35 10 28 0.263 0.458 0.246
Central Arkansas 255.20 16 22 0.421 0.539 0.345
Cincinnati 270.19 20 21 0.488 0.541 0.379
Eastern Illinois 197.42 5 33 0.132 0.531 0.199
Eastern Kentucky 234.10 17 25 0.405 0.485 0.324
Georgia Tech 296.15 27 14 0.659 0.566 0.471
Illinois 240.07 20 17 0.541 0.518 0.400
Illinois State 271.43 12 27 0.308 0.481 0.274
Indiana 201.88 23 16 0.590 0.477 0.414
Indiana State 203.30 24 16 0.600 0.495 0.424
Jacksonville State 240.71 26 14 0.650 0.520 0.455
Kennesaw State 276.29 20 23 0.465 0.500 0.358
Kentucky 231.15 26 15 0.634 0.571 0.460
Louisville 177.79 32 9 0.780 0.580 0.535
Miami, Ohio 279.04 20 20 0.500 0.472 0.368
Mississippi 170.45 32 11 0.744 0.595 0.521
Mississippi State 220.01 29 13 0.690 0.607 0.497
Missouri 271.51 21 21 0.500 0.566 0.391
Missouri State 277.07 28 11 0.718 0.445 0.470
Morehead State 289.50 23 18 0.561 0.492 0.404
Northern Kentucky 267.93 15 27 0.357 0.459 0.293
Purdue 273.84 7 31 0.184 0.520 0.222
Samford 234.66 24 18 0.571 0.531 0.418
Southern Illinois-Edwardsville 176.74 8 28 0.222 0.542 0.246
St. Louis 173.93 16 24 0.400 0.433 0.308
Tennessee 248.76 24 18 0.571 0.559 0.425
Tennessee Tech 158.95 21 18 0.538 0.411 0.372
Western Illinois 295.17 10 24 0.294 0.495 0.271
Xavier 272.63 16 26 0.381 0.523 0.321

If you're interested in reprinting this or any other Boyd's World material for your publication or Web site, please read the reprint policy and contact me

Boyd's World-> Ratings-> Pseudo-RPI's-> Schedule Analysis About the author, Boyd Nation